首页 | 金融服务法总论|证券和金融商品交易法|银行法票据法|保险法|信托法|金融公法|金融税法|环境金融法|国际金融法|法金融学
中财法学论坛|国外动态|金融服务法评论|金融服务法研究咨询报告|金融法案例|金融法规速递|金融消费者教育|课程与课件|金融法考试
 今天是
中国法学会证券法学研究会2025年年会会议议程      扎根中国大地 立足中国实际 为推进中国式现代化提供有力法治保障      年会通知 | 中国法学会证券法学研究会2023年年会通知      北京市金融服务法学研究会2022年会成功举行     
您现在的位置:首页>>>国外动态
SEC 26日起诉一起伪绿色科技公司及高管以财务预测欺诈投资者
上传时间:2016/8/27
浏览次数:1003
字体大小:

SEC: Purported Green Technology Company Defrauding Investors

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2016-170
Washington D.C., Aug. 26, 2016  

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a California-based company and two executives with using b

aseless financial projections

and other misleading statements to defraud investors in a venture to manufacture environmentally-friendly building materials.

The SEC alleges that Enviro Board Corporation and its co-chairmen/CEOs Glenn Camp and William Peiffer raised approximately $6 million from investors during a four-year period by using documents predicting company earnings ranging from $18 million to $95 million per year.  

They allegedly lacked any reasonable basis for such estimates amid persistent manufacturing problems plaguing the company since its inception.  

Enviro Board claimed its green materials had already been used in residential and commercial construction projects, yet the company has never developed a commercially viable mill to manufacture its products.  

Among other alleged misrepresentations to investors were claims to have secured $161 million in financing from a “vendor” that turned out to be nothing more than an entity created by Peiffer that lacked the resources to actually make such a loan.

Meanwhile, according to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Los Angeles, Camp and Peiffer and their primary salesman Joshua Mosshart have paid themselves approximately $2.6 million in compensation out of investor funds.  

Mosshart also is named in the SEC’s complaint and charged with selling unregistered securities and acting as an unregistered broker.

“We allege that Enviro Board appealed to investors’ desires to benefit the environment by creating the false impression that it was on the cusp of lucrative operations.  But Camp and Peiffer were merely lining their own pockets while their unviable manufacturing process has failed to commercialize after nearly 20 years of trying,” said Michele Wein Layne, Director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office.

The SEC’s complaint charges Enviro Board, Camp, and Peiffer with violating Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5(b).  

The complaint further charges Camp and Mosshart with violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act and Mosshart with violating Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act.  The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus interest and penalties, and officer-and-director bars against Camp and Peiffer. 

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by William Fiske, Peter Del Greco, Maria D. Rodriguez, and Marc Blau of the Los Angeles office, and the litigation will be led by Gary Leung and supervised by John W. Berry.  The SEC appreciates assistance from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.


 
 
分享到: 豆瓣 更多
【打印此文】 【收藏此文】 【关闭窗口】

网站简介 | 联系我们 | 网站地图 | 网站管理

公众微信二维码
建议使用IE6.0以上1024*768浏览器访问本站 京ICP备14028265号
如果您有与网站相关的任何问题,请及时与我们联系(financialservicelaw@126.com),我们将做妥善处理!
版权所有©转载本网站内容,请注明转自"中国金融服务法治网"
欢迎您!第 位访问者!